Part 5: The Reckoning – From Neo-Nazis to Charlottesville to Kanye West
Gentleman’s Agreement: Then & Now
“It can happen here. Maybe it has.”
—Gentleman’s Agreement (1947)
How did we get here?
How did we get from Gentleman’s Agreement—a bold, conscience-driven film that dared to speak America’s name alongside antisemitism—to a country where antisemitic tweets trend globally, Holocaust denial lives on YouTube, and pop culture megastars declare love for Hitler?
This is the reckoning.
The final chapter in our five-part journey through American antisemitism is not a tidy ending. It’s a warning. A culmination. A shattering reminder that history doesn’t just repeat—it evolves, adapts, and reemerges in new disguises.
The Backlash to Conscience
If the 1940s saw a brief moral awakening in the aftermath of the Holocaust, the decades that followed revealed how fragile that awakening was, especially in today’s America.
In the Cold War years, anti-Semitism didn’t disappear—it simply mutated. The Red Scare redirected suspicion onto Jewish intellectuals and leftists. By the 1970s, white supremacist groups—I won’t dignify them by name them here—were using new media to spread old hate, often cloaked in anti-Communism or anti-globalism.
When civil rights progress accelerated, so did resentment. Jews, perceived by bigots as “too successful,” became targets again—from the far-right fiction that Jews were part of an imagined liberal elite, and from the far-left fiction that Jews betray progressive ideals because of their ties to Israel.
By the 1980s and 90s, antisemitism had fractured into contradictory forms:
Jews are both too rich and too radical.
Too assimilated and too tribal.
Secretly control Hollywood, finance, politics, etc.—
Have so-called dual loyalty.
This cognitive dissonance is the breeding ground of modern conspiracy theory. Then came the Internet.
Hate Goes Digital
In the early 2000s, fringe views found a new home online. Certain platforms—again, I won’t dignify them here—became hothouses for racial hatred, Holocaust denial, and coded anti-Semitism disguised as “edgy irony.”
The old dog whistles—globalist, Soros, cabal, media elite, Zionist occupier—gained digital reach. Algorithms fed outrage. And suddenly, anti-Semitism wasn’t just on the margins. It was trending.
By 2017, the world watched in horror as white supremacists marched through Charlottesville chanting “Jews will not replace us.” This wasn’t just a slogan—it was the “Great Replacement” theory laid bare, a conspiracy that blames Jews for orchestrating demographic change to weaken white Christian identity. And the president of the United States announced that “there are good people on both sides.”
Charlottesville was a turning point. It proved that anti=Semitism wasn’t hiding in dark corners—it was standing in plain sight, khakis and tiki torches in hand.
And still, worse was coming.
Kanye, Kyrie, and the Collapse of Shame
The 2020s have seen anti-Semitism shed its remaining shame.
When Kanye West, a global music icon and fashion mogul, tweeted that he wanted to go “death con 3 on JEWISH PEOPLE,” it wasn’t a fringe comment. It was mainstream, amplified, and echoed. His fans defended him. His audience barely flinched.
When NBA star Kyrie Irving shared a Holocaust-denying documentary on social media, then refused to apologize, he was suspended—but not disowned. He was, like so many before him, more protected than the people he harmed.
The boundaries have shifted. Anti-Semitism is now part of culture war discourse. It’s embedded in both far-right conspiracy theories (The Jews control the media) and far-left overreach (Israel is the world’s evil). It’s legitimized by influencers, tolerated by platforms, and shrugged off by millions.
And still—somehow—it’s denied.
The Erosion of Memory
What makes today’s anti-Semitism so dangerous isn’t just its visibility. It’s the erosion of collective memory.
We are losing Holocaust survivors. We are forgetting what “Never Again” was supposed to mean.
Schools are afraid to teach about anti-Semitism and the president is defunding these programs as I write this. Universities host speakers who normalize it. Gen Z TikTokers question whether the Holocaust “really happened”—and Gen Alpha is learning history from memes.
In 1947, Gentleman’s Agreement tried to expose the subtle, socially acceptable forms of antisemitism—the kind that smiles while closing the door.
Today, the door has been kicked open again . . . wide.
So, Where Do We Go From Here?
We return to Gentleman’s Agreement, not for nostalgia, but for resolve.
The film asked Americans to look in the mirror. Not to point fingers at Nazis, but to confront their own silence. Their own polite prejudices. Their own complicity.
The same challenge endures today.
Will we remain silent when public figures normalize hate?
Will we excuse anti-Semitism when it comes from our side of the aisle?
Will we allow Holocaust denial to fester in our digital town squares?
Will we—Jews and gentiles alike—dare to speak up again?
The Agreement Revisited
In Gentleman’s Agreement, Gregory Peck’s character poses as a Jew to see how the world might treat him. He learns that anti-Semitism doesn’t always wear a swastika. Sometimes it wears a smile. A handshake. A denial.
Today, you don’t need to pose. You just need to post. Or speak. Or visibly exist.
But the lesson remains: the agreement is not between Jews and Gentiles. The agreement is between all decent people and a conscience that asks, “What will you do when hatred knocks?”
The time for polite agreement is over.
This is the reckoning.
Thank you for joining me for this five-part journey through America’s long, unfinished struggle with anti-Semitism—from the shadows of the 1920s to the fire-lit faces of Charlottesville, and beyond. If you found value in this series, consider sharing it. Because remembering is resistance. And silence, as always, is consent.