Gentlemen's Agreement: Before & After—A Five Part Study of a Century of American Anti-Semitism
Part I: Before the Film – The Climate of American Antisemitism (1920s–1940s)
In 1947, a non-Jewish movie mogul named Darryl F. Zanuck released one of the most daring films of its era: Gentleman’s Agreement. While it was not the first film to address American bigotry, Gentleman’s Agreement was the first mainstream studio film to directly confront anti-Semitism as a social disease embedded in ‘polite society.’
The film landed like a bombshell—earning critical acclaim, sparking controversy, and winning an Oscar for Best Picture. But to understand why the film was so groundbreaking, one must first understand the anti-Semitic climate that preceded it.
The Quiet Scourge: Antisemitism In America Between the Wars
From 1918 to1921, thousands of Jewish refugees flooded into Moscow from Ukraine, fleeing a terrifying series of pogroms. More than 1,100 pogroms killed over 100,000 Jews. This earlier wave of anti-Semitism has been largely ignored by historians. 20 years later Nazi Germany institutionalized anti-Semitism through law and genocide, wiping out over 6,000,00 milion Jews in the process. During these times, the United States harbored its own, much quieter form of Jew-hatred. From the 1920s through the 1940s, anti-Semitism was neither fringe nor universally condemned—it was mainstream, respectable, and often cloaked in euphemism.
Elite universities like Harvard, Yale, and Princeton imposed strict Jewish quotas. Social clubs denied Jewish membership and real estate developers expelled Jews from neighborhoods with blatant restrictive covenants. Popular radio figures like Father Charles Coughlin spread Jew-hating conspiracies to millions. Industrial titan Henry Ford published the anti-Semitic screed *The International Jew*, which Adolf Hitler cited as an inspiration. Even after news of the Holocaust emerged, the U.S. government and public remained shockingly indifferent—refusing to raise immigration quotas or bomb rail lines to death camps.
Why Darryl F. Zanuck Spoke Out
As previously noted, Darryl F. Zanuck was not Jewish—he was a Protestant. He became incensed after he was denied membership at the Los Angeles Country Club. He believed that the club’s rejection was based on the assumption that his last name “sounded” Jewish and that he has Jewish business associates.
As head of 20th Century Fox, Zanuck resolved to dramatize anti-Semitism for mainstream audiences. He acquired *Gentleman’s Agreement*, a novel by Laura Z. Hobson, a Jewish woman who wrote under a pseudonym. Zanuck greenlit the adaptation because he believed Americans would only confront bigotry if they saw it from a ‘respectable’ Christian man’s perspective. He cast budding superstar Gregory Peck as a gentile journalist who poses as a Jew to expose social discrimination.
In doing so, Zanuck underscored a brutal truth: that Jewish suffering could only be acknowledged when filtered through gentile pain. And yet, his decision helped break a long-standing Hollywood taboo and opened the door to a new genre of film—those that challenged social injustice.
A Nation of Unspoken Boundaries
Anti-Semitism during this period was mainstream in American life. It was not limited to country clubs or boardrooms—Jews faced barriers in journalism, medicine, law, and the arts. Neighborhoods like New York’s Upper East Side or Chicago’s North Shore were off-limits, enforcing unconstitutional restrictive covenants in deeds. Even Hollywood—an industry built in large part by Jewish émigrés—avoided stories that could be labeled ‘too Jewish,’ fearing backlash from bigoted mainstream America or anti-Semitic politicians. The era’s culture of fear and self-censorship made Zanuck’s decision all the more radical.
In fact, by the mid-1940s, anti-Semitism had become so “normal” it was invisible to anyone who wasn’t Jewish. And that invisibility was precisely the target of *Gentleman’s Agreement*. Neither the book nor the movie was aimed at hate groups—their target was ordinary American bigots who believed they were “decent” even though they participated in and perpetuated religious, ethnic, and racial exclusion.
Coming Next: The Making of a Cultural Earthquake
In Part II, I will peek behind the curtain to examine the making of *Gentleman’s Agreement*—what risks Zanuck and his contemporaries took, who resisted the release of the movie, and why its success both thrilled and terrified postwar America.